Protein labeling technologies covalently attach different protein molecules such as biotin, enzymes, fluorophores and radioactive isotopes. There are different types of labels available depending upon various requirements. The global protein labelling market is estimated to reach $3.02 Billion by 2025, from $1.55 Billion in 2017 at a CAGR of 11.7% during the forecast period 2019-2025. Increasing government funding and investments in research and development, increase in adoption of bioengineering techniques and rise in technological advancements are major drivers boosting the growth of the market. Lack of trained professionals and increasing competition in the protein labeling market has adversely affected the market growth. Developing and emerging economies and greater potency with reduced costs and increasing affordability are offering major opportunities to the protein labelling market.
Research Study Objectives:
- Define, estimate, and forecast the protein labeling market statistics by labeling method, product, application and regions concerning the individual growth drivers, market trends and their contribution toward the Protein labeling market growth.
- Provides comprehensive information regarding the key factors influencing the market growth (Drivers, Restraints & Challenges, and Opportunities).
- Estimate & forecast the market size of all the segments concerning geographies including North America, Europe, Asia Pacific (APAC), South America and the Middle East and Africa (MEA).
- Recent competitive developments including M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions), Partnerships, and Product Innovations are provided in the protein labeling market analysis report.
- Analysis and conclusions on the future protein labeling market outlook.
Top-down and bottom-up approaches are used to validate the protein labeling market size and are used to estimate the size of other dependent submarkets. Key players in the market are identified through various secondary sources; databases including Bloomberg Businessweek, Hoovers, Factiva, journals
and associations and the market revenues are estimated and are thoroughly validated through primary and secondary research. Secondary research involves the study of annual and financial reports of top players in the market, whereas primary research includes extensive interviews with the KoL’s such as CEOs, directors, board members, VP’s, sales managers, engineers, marketing executives, technicians, account managers, investors, strategic decision makers and others. The protein labeling market shares and breakdowns are determined using secondary sources and are verified by the primary sources. All possible parameters/factors that are affecting the protein labeling market demand are covered in the research study are verified through primary research, analysed and interpreted to get the final qualitative and quantitative data. This data is collected and added with detailed analysis from Envision Inteligence and presented in this report.
The scope of the Report
The protein labeling market segmentation is as follows:
By Labeling Method
- In vitro labeling
- Nanoparticle labeling
- Site-specific Labeling
- Dye-based
- Co-translational labeling
- Enzymatic Labeling
- In vivo labeling
- Radioactive Labeling
- Photoreactive Labeling
- Bioorthogonal labeling
By Product
- Reagents
- Enzymes
- Monoclonal Antibodies
- Probes/Tags
- Protein
- Kits
- Services
By Application
- Cell-based Assays
- Fluorescence Microscopy
- Immunological Techniques
- Mass Spectrometry
- Protein Microarray
Geographical Analysis:
Protein labeling market is segmented by geography into North America, South America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Middle East & Africa. U.S., Canada, Mexico and Costa Rica are analysed under North American region which is usually turning as the hotspot in the market. The South American region is further segregated into Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Columbia and some other emerging economies. In Europe, the market is extensively examined by covering U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland and some other promising economies. The Asia Pacific is further categorised by countries into China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia & New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore and many other emerging
nations. In the Middle East & African region, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Iraq, Qatar, South Africa, Algeria, Morocco, Nigeria and so on countries are evaluated to understand the market growth lucidly.
Customization Options:
With the given research report, Envision Inteligence offers customisations as per the client’s specific requirements. The following customisation options offered for the protein labeling market include:
- Scope Revision
- Geographic Analysis
- Company Profiles
- Historical Data & Forecasting
- Key Contact Persons in companies
Global Protein labeling Market Research Report Includes:
- An executive summary condensing the whole report such that essential authority can rapidly twist up doubtlessly acquainted with brief overview and conclusion.
- To have a complete market analysis through industry value chain analysis, Porter’s Five Force Model, PESTLE, SWOT analysis, and Y-o-Y analysis.
- Regional and global diversity is analysed with the major countries and the unions. Scrutinizing the revenue generation on Year-On-Year
- Identifying DROC in the current market and their impact on altering market dynamics.
- Competitive landscape analysis to identify the merger and acquisition which will have a comparative financial study with significant competitors.
- Expertise investment opportunities by an analyst to the individual and organisation to have a better foothold in the market.
- Identify the latest developments, market shares and strategies that are employed by the significant protein labeling market players, such as
- Kaneka Corporation
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
- Merck Millipore
- Promega Corporation
- Hoffmann-La Roche AG
- Along with these companies, many other companies are considered in the report while analysing the global protein labeling competitive strategies and environment. These companies held substantial share-owning to the nature of the industry whereas, the rest of the market shares are marginal chunks to regional and local level manufacturers. Other players also have considerable presence owing to its robust brand image, geographical reach and stable customer base.
